New Jersey Criminal Defense Lawyers

CALL NOW 877-450-8301

  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • Locations
  • Contact
  • News
  • Articles

New Jersey Cops Attacked By 2 Criminals on Thanksgiving

2 Brooklyn men charged on Thanksgiving DayThis episode took place at Target stores on 27th November, when New Jersey police officers were appointed at Target in order to support the existing security personnel in checking customer receipts while they were departing from the store. Occasions like Thanksgiving witnesses a heavier crowd than usual days; therefore, to keep up with the security, the cops were prearranged.

Patrick Perroud, 25, a Brooklyn inhabitant, knocked down a cop in an attempt to escape getting caught with the purchases he had made using deceptive credit cards. Few moments later, his partner, Quari Padia, 25, was also caught by the police while he was scrapping 8 credit cards.

Both the criminals were held liable for the following charges:

  • Robbery,
  • Deceptive utilization of credit cards,
  • Denying arrest,
  • Hitting a police officer,
  • Impeding the entire course.

According to the police’s statement, there were 18 proceeds in Perroud’s bag except for the iPad. The criminals purchased 26 gift cards worth $500 each with a different credit card. When the police asked Perroud to cross check the purchases against the entries made by the store, he ran swiftly towards the door while punching down the security guards. When the police officers tracked him, Perroud punched them in the chest too.

Perroud made his way to the parking lot, where he threw the credit cards and got arrested by the cops. The police told that Perroud was in possession of 9 fraudulent credit cards. Padia, who was wearing a black coat with a low hat, was also caught by the police officers while he was running away.

Perroud came before the Central Judicial Processing court, located in New Jersey on Monday, through a video call from the Hudson County Jail in Kearney. The honorable judge, Margaret Marley announced a bail totaling $40,000 cash/bond. Padia’s appearance before the judge is awaited.

Practice Areas

  • Assault
  • Domestic Violence
  • Drug Crimes
  • DWI
  • Juvenile Offenses
  • Sex Crimes
  • Theft & Fraud
  • Weapons Offense
  • Immigration

Contact Us

The Law Offices of Jonathan F. Marshall
Telephone: (732) 450-8300
Fax: (732) 450-8377
See Our Locations

Search Our Website

Latest Legal News:

Tolling Sexual Assault Cases in New Jersey Schools and Campuses

This year has broken records of the past 10 years combined with the highest sexual assault cases. In 2013, 94 cases were reported with the campus security Continue Reading...

Three Teenagers in Illegal Possession of Drugs Busted By Madison Police

Illegal smuggling and consumption of drugs are on the rise. Sadly, majority of the culprits are teenagers. What drives them into this business is the need of Continue Reading...

New Jersey Cops Attacked By 2 Criminals on Thanksgiving

This episode took place at Target stores on 27th November, when New Jersey police officers were appointed at Target in order to support the existing security Continue Reading...

Copyright © 2025 · Minimum Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Contact Us Electronically




    Speak With an Attorney

    • Telephone: (732) 450-8301
    • See Our Locations
    The criminal defense attorneys at The Law Offices of Jonathan F. Marshall have over 100 years of combined legal experience, and has successfully handled criminal defense cases in virtually every New Jersey county, including Bergen, Mercer, Middlesex, Morris, Monmouth, Ocean and Union counties.

    Visit Our Firm

    Disclaimers

    Site Disclaimer

    This site was constructed for the purposes of providing information relating to The Law Offices of Jonathan F. Marshall and the members of such firm. You are not considered a client of the firm until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by one of our practicing attorneys.

    Note on Prior Results

    Prior results, notwithstanding the similarity of circumstances, do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any pending or future matter.